Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio: mpfs-gpio: allow parsing of hog child nodes.

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 25/08/2022 15:30, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 25/08/2022 13:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On 20/08/2022 23:41, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> The SD card and eMMC on PolarFire SoC based dev boards are sometimes
>>> statically muxed using a GPIO. To facilitate this, enable gpio-hog
>>> child node properties.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml     | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml
>>> index 110651eafa70..6704a7a52cd0 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml
>>> @@ -44,6 +44,24 @@ properties:
>>>
>>>     gpio-controller: true
>>>
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> +  "^.+-hog(?:-[0-9]+)?$":
>>
>> What is this pattern about: "(?:" ?
> 
> Me being a pedant I suppose. "()" is a capture while "(?:)" is a match.
> However, it does seem like json-schema suggests using "()":
> https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/regular_expressions.html
> 
> I don't mind & neither does the schema checker.

Use what existing sources are doing, so "^.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?$"

Best regards,
Krzysztof