Hello Lee, thanks for picking up patches 1 and 2. What about the others, should you pick also those? 3 and 4 do have all the required acks, I'm not sure about 5 however that has the ack only from Krzysztof. Francesco On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 06:33:40PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > Hi all, > This series update the STMPE MFD driver to use of_compatible to probe for > sub-functions instead of using hardcoded names. Matching by name does not seems > in general a good idea, in this specific case it is even worst since the node > name are not compliant to the current naming convention (they are not generic > and they do include underscores), and because of that recently > we had a regression introduced [1].
Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: stmpe: Probe sub-function by compatible
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: stmpe: Probe sub-function by compatible
- From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 09:54:16 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20220712163345.445811-1-francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
- References: <20220712163345.445811-1-francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: stmpe: Probe sub-function by compatible
- From: Lee Jones
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: stmpe: Probe sub-function by compatible
- References:
- [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: stmpe: Probe sub-function by compatible
- From: Francesco Dolcini
- [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: stmpe: Probe sub-function by compatible
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH V5 0/8] libgpiod: Add Rust bindings
- Next by Date: [PATCH] gpio: Allow user to customise maximum number of GPIOs
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: gpio: stmpe: Remove node name requirement
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: stmpe: Probe sub-function by compatible
- Index(es):
 |