Hello, On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:13:11AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 9:50 AM Uwe Kleine-König > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:54:18AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > ... > > > (And if you have a "native" spi bus, even better.) This way the > > nxp,74hc4094 driver becomes way easier. > > Just to say (point out again?) that > 1) The SPI can be bitbanging in this case, so GPIO lines can be used; Yeah, in my example GPIO lines were used. > 2) We have a driver already, which is called gpio-74x164. I'm also aware. My reply was on Linus's binding example which *only* supports bit-banging and which is different to what the 74x164 driver consumes. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature