On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 3:13 PM Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This extends the flags that can be used in GPIO specifiers to indicate > that no bias is intended in the pin. > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: add pull-disable flag
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: add pull-disable flag
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 12:33:04 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20220713131421.1527179-5-nuno.sa@analog.com>
- References: <20220713131421.1527179-1-nuno.sa@analog.com> <20220713131421.1527179-5-nuno.sa@analog.com>
- References:
- [PATCH 0/4] add support for bias pull-disable
- From: Nuno Sá
- [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: add pull-disable flag
- From: Nuno Sá
- [PATCH 0/4] add support for bias pull-disable
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gpiolib: acpi: support bias pull disable
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: gpio: stmpe: Remove node name requirement
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: add pull-disable flag
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: add pull-disable flag
- Index(es):
 |