Re: [PATCH 6/6] gpiolib: cdev: compile out HTE unless CONFIG_HTE selected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 06:30:14PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:03:07PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 3:39 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > The majority of builds do not include HTE, so compile out hte
> > > functionality unless CONFIG_HTE is selected.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HTE
> > >         /*
> > >          * -- hte specific fields --
> > >          */
> > 
> > Now this comment seems useless to me and it takes 3 LoCs.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > +       else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HTE) &&
> > > +                (test_bit(FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HTE, &line->desc->flags)))
> > 
> > Too many parentheses.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > +               if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HTE) ||
> > > +                   !test_bit(FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HTE, &line->desc->flags)) {
> > 
> > if (!(x && y)) ?
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HTE) &&
> > > +           (flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HTE))
> > > +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > 
> > Ditto for consistency?
> > 

On second thought, that last one becomes:

	if (!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HTE) ||
	      !(flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HTE))
		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

which is MUCH less readable, so I'll leave that one as is.

Cheers,
Kent.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux