On 11/07/2022 13:03, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 11/07/2022 at 10:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >> >> The SAMA5D2 PIOBU is only present on some AT91/Microchip SoCs. Hence >> add a dependency on ARCH_AT91, to prevent asking the user about this >> driver when configuring a kernel without AT91/Microchip SoC support. >> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > Looks good to me: > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm adding to the thread my colleagues from lan966 and mpfs if it > happens that they use this same IP on their SoC. Anyway, we can > add them afterwards. Not on FPGAs, so you're safe there!
Re: [PATCH] gpio: GPIO_SAMA5D2_PIOBU should depend on ARCH_AT91
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: GPIO_SAMA5D2_PIOBU should depend on ARCH_AT91
- From: <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:08:53 +0000
- Accept-language: en-IE, en-US
- In-reply-to: <8dbed370-c6d6-496c-eb41-efce2ee78286@microchip.com>
- References: <9996cb86818d2e935494d6b414d549432f91797a.1657528504.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> <8dbed370-c6d6-496c-eb41-efce2ee78286@microchip.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: GPIO_SAMA5D2_PIOBU should depend on ARCH_AT91
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: GPIO_SAMA5D2_PIOBU should depend on ARCH_AT91
- From: Nicolas Ferre
- [PATCH] gpio: GPIO_SAMA5D2_PIOBU should depend on ARCH_AT91
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: core: Use device_match_of_node() helper
- Next by Date: Re: Re: [PATCH] gpio: gpiolib-of: Fix refcount bugs in of_mm_gpiochip_add_data()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: GPIO_SAMA5D2_PIOBU should depend on ARCH_AT91
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: GPIO_SAMA5D2_PIOBU should depend on ARCH_AT91
- Index(es):
 |