Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 10:17 PM Colin Foster
<colin.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 09:55:10PM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > The blamed commit changed to use regmaps instead of __iomem. But it
> > didn't update the register offsets to be at word offset, so it uses byte
> > offset.
> > Another issue with the same commit is that it a limit of 32 registers

it has a limit

> > which is incorrect. The sparx5 has 64 while lan966x has 77.

...

> > -             .max_register = 32,
>
> What happens in /sys/kernel/debug/regmap/*-pincfg/{range,registers} when
> there's no max register?

Good question!

> Should it be this?
>
> struct regmap_config regmap_config = {
>     ...
> };
> regmap_config.max_register = info->desc->npins * regmap_config.reg_stride;
>
> >               .name = "pincfg",
> >       };

If regmap configuration may be const, I would prefer to have a
hardcoded value and different configuration based on the chip, but if
it's not feasible, then this could suffice.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko