Re: [PATCH v4 06/15] mfd: axp20x: Add support for AXP192

[Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 05 Jul 2022, Aidan MacDonald wrote:

> 
> Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2022, Aidan MacDonald wrote:
> >
> >> The AXP192 PMIC is similar to the AXP202/AXP209, but with different
> >> regulators, additional GPIOs, and a different IRQ register layout.
> >> 
> >> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c   |   2 +
> >>  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c       | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h |  84 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  3 files changed, 238 insertions(+)
> >> [...]
> >> +static const struct regmap_irq_chip axp192_regmap_irq_chip = {
> >> +	.name			= "axp192_irq_chip",
> >> +	.status_base		= AXP192_IRQ1_STATE,
> >> +	.ack_base		= AXP192_IRQ1_STATE,
> >> +	.unmask_base		= AXP192_IRQ1_EN,
> >> +	.init_ack_masked	= true,
> >> +	.irqs			= axp192_regmap_irqs,
> >> +	.num_irqs		= ARRAY_SIZE(axp192_regmap_irqs),
> >> +	.num_regs		= 5,
> >> +	.get_irq_reg		= axp192_get_irq_reg,
> >
> > Fix me:
> >
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x.c:634:35: error: initialization of 'unsigned int (*)(struct regmap_irq_chip_data *, unsigned int,  int)' from incompatible pointer type 'int (*)(unsigned int,  int)' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >   634 |         .get_irq_reg            = axp192_get_irq_reg,
> >       |                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x.c:634:35: note: (near initialization for 'axp192_regmap_irq_chip.get_irq_reg')
> >
> 
> This doesn't need fixing. You are missing the prerequisite patches.
> 
> -- snip --
> Changes in v4:
> * Drop regmap-irq patches and rebase on top of the regmap-irq
>   refactoring series[1], which implements the same functionality.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220623211420.918875-1-aidanmacdonald.0x0@xxxxxxxxx/
> -- snip --

> Perhaps I wasn't clear enough that it was a dependency, sorry for
> any confusion.

Any idea why the regmap-irq patches weren't in -next?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog