On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 9:59 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in > their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function > ("probe_new") can be used instead. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-adnp.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-adnp.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-adnp.c > index cc349d4e4973..075782831044 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-adnp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-adnp.c > @@ -485,8 +485,7 @@ static int adnp_gpio_setup(struct adnp *adnp, unsigned int num_gpios, > return 0; > } > > -static int adnp_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > - const struct i2c_device_id *id) > +static int adnp_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client) > { > struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node; > struct adnp *adnp; > @@ -535,7 +534,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver adnp_i2c_driver = { > .name = "gpio-adnp", > .of_match_table = adnp_of_match, > }, > - .probe = adnp_i2c_probe, > + .probe_new = adnp_i2c_probe, > .id_table = adnp_i2c_id, > }; > module_i2c_driver(adnp_i2c_driver); > -- > 2.35.1 > Applied, thanks! Bart