Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] dt-bindings: arm: freescale: Switch fsl,scu from txt to yaml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22-06-30 20:03:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/06/2022 14:13, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote:
> > On 22-06-29 19:51:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 29/06/2022 18:44, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote:
> >>> From: Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@xxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v5: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220616164303.790379-1-viorel.suman@xxxxxxx/
> >>>   * Updated according to Krzysztof Kozlowski comments
> >>>
> >>
> >> My comment a about removal of each part of TXT bindings in each patch,
> >> was not addressed. Your approach makes it more difficult to read patches
> >> and makes sense only if each subsystem maintainer will take the patches
> >> (separately). If the patches are going through one tree, then better to
> >> remove the TXT gradually.
> >>
> >> So the question - who is going to take each of the patches?
> > 
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > 
> > I just understood the context of your comment, will do it in the next version.
> > 
> > Assuming TXT is removed from aggregating TXT - fsl,scu.txt - gradually, do you expect the
> > removed to be added into the aggregating YAML - fsl,scu.yaml - also gradually within the
> > same patch ?
> 
> Each patch making the conversion should remove the piece being
> converted. Then finally the patch adding fsl,scu.yaml should remove the
> last pieces (remaining ones).

Thank you for clarification, will follow this approach in the next version.

Regards,
Viorel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux