Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] gpio: adp5588: sort header inclusion alphabetically

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 12:10 PM Sa, Nuno <Nuno.Sa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 12:00 PM
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:50 AM Hennerich, Michael
> > <Michael.Hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2022 21:39

...

> > > > Sort header inclusion alphabetically.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patches, they look good.
> > > However, Nuno is currently working on getting the irqchip support
> > into the
> > > adp5588 input driver. In his patch series this driver is going away.
> > >
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
> > input/YpMCh1Xje*jsny8j@xxxxxxxxxx/__;Kw!!A3Ni8CS0y2Y!_Cb1uAs
> > D-
> > Z6iz_zSDfrd5Va6zLmdoxjv1vLYWQGHDOqYniaXVVHl3Ou2lOUQIjwhSN
> > Ku2aZkYrOb8xMi2cZtfmsv$
> >
> > While that work is ongoing, and most likely won't make v5.20-rc1, for
> > the v5.20-rc1 I think my patches are good to go to avoid a bad (or
> > rather very old) example on how to do GPIO drivers. What do you
> > think?
>
> Just as note, If nothing unexpected happens, I'm planning in sending this
> out today. If you still think this makes sense, fine by me. It's a very minimal
> change that won't give much pain to deal with...

Ah, Okay, I was thinking about a week or two from now. Let's see how
it will go and let Linus decide how to proceed.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko