Re: [PATCH 6/6] i2c: Make remove callback return void

[Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 29/06/2022 à 09:23, Uwe Kleine-König a écrit :
> Hello,
> 
> [I dropped nearly all individuals from the Cc: list because various
> bounces reported to be unhappy about the long (logical) line.]

Good idea, even patchwork made a mess of it, see 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20220628140313.74984-7-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

> 
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 03:03:54PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>> Looks good - just one minor change for the mctp-i2c driver, but only
>> worthwhile if you end up re-rolling this series for other reasons:
>>
>>> -static int mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>> +static void mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>>   {
>>>          struct mctp_i2c_client *mcli = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>>>          struct mctp_i2c_dev *midev = NULL, *tmp = NULL;
>>> @@ -1000,7 +1000,6 @@ static int mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>>          mctp_i2c_free_client(mcli);
>>>          mutex_unlock(&driver_clients_lock);
>>>          /* Callers ignore return code */
>>> -       return 0;
>>>   }
>>
>> The comment there no longer makes much sense, I'd suggest removing that
>> too.
> 
> Yeah, that was already pointed out to me in a private reply. It's
> already fixed in
> 
> 	https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/ukl/linux/log/?h=i2c-remove-void
> 
>> Either way:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Added to my tree, too.
> 
> Thanks
> Uwe
>