Hi Geert Thank you for your feedback > For missing features (e.g. missing alternative functions, missing > support for using I2C-capable pins as GPIOs, ...) I agree: these can > be added incrementally. > > For descriptions that are wrong, I disagree: please try to fix them > in the patch that introduces them, if possible. Yes of course. v3 patch of [3/4][4/4] will includes comment fixup, alphabetical order fixup, variable name fixup, etc, for each patches. Basically non code area. And, it will have additional patch for missing features (add xxx support). > Unfortunately some of the (lack of) set names need confirmation or > clarification from the hardware documentation team. Yes. In such case, I will use _X or _Y for now to avoid future conflict. > BTW, do you know which devices and pin groups have been tested on > actual hardware? I didn't test, but [4/4] patches are, I guess. Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto