Re: [PATCH RFC] pinctrl: bcm2835: Make the irqchip immutable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marc,

Am 10.06.22 um 10:51 schrieb Marc Zyngier:
On 2022-06-07 11:33, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Commit 6c846d026d49 ("gpio: Don't fiddle with irqchips marked as
immutable") added a warning to indicate if the gpiolib is altering the
internals of irqchips. The bcm2835 pinctrl is also affected by this
warning.

Fix this by making the irqchip in the bcm2835 pinctrl driver immutable.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx>
---

Hi, not sure about this change because irq_mask/unmask also uses the
enable/disable callbacks.

Yeah, that's totally broken.

If you have both enable and mask, they *must* be doing something
different (the names are pretty unambiguous...). If they do the
same thing, then enable/disable has to go.
i will send a seperate fix for this.


 drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
index dad453054776..f754f7ed9eb9 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
@@ -516,6 +516,8 @@ static void bcm2835_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
     unsigned bank = GPIO_REG_OFFSET(gpio);
     unsigned long flags;

+    gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, gpio);
+
     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags);
     set_bit(offset, &pc->enabled_irq_map[bank]);
     bcm2835_gpio_irq_config(pc, gpio, true);
@@ -537,6 +539,8 @@ static void bcm2835_gpio_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data)
     bcm2835_gpio_set_bit(pc, GPEDS0, gpio);
     clear_bit(offset, &pc->enabled_irq_map[bank]);
     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags);
+
+    gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, gpio);
 }

 static int __bcm2835_gpio_irq_set_type_disabled(struct bcm2835_pinctrl *pc,
@@ -693,7 +697,7 @@ static int bcm2835_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct
irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
     return ret;
 }

-static struct irq_chip bcm2835_gpio_irq_chip = {
+static const struct irq_chip bcm2835_gpio_irq_chip = {
     .name = MODULE_NAME,
     .irq_enable = bcm2835_gpio_irq_enable,
     .irq_disable = bcm2835_gpio_irq_disable,
@@ -702,7 +706,7 @@ static struct irq_chip bcm2835_gpio_irq_chip = {
     .irq_mask = bcm2835_gpio_irq_disable,
     .irq_unmask = bcm2835_gpio_irq_enable,
     .irq_set_wake = bcm2835_gpio_irq_set_wake,
-    .flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND,
+    .flags = (IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE),

You are missing the callbacks into the resource management
code (GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS).
Thanks

Thanks,

        M.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux