On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 01:07:27PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:55:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The callers already have dereferenced pointer to GPIO chip, no need to > > do it again in chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(). Hence, replace IRQ data pointer > > by GPIO chip pointer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: cherryview: Use GPIO chip pointer in chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: cherryview: Use GPIO chip pointer in chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask()
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 19:34:41 +0300
- In-reply-to: <YoNz34dfCIrKYn6n@lahna>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20220516185500.32304-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <YoNz34dfCIrKYn6n@lahna>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: cherryview: Use GPIO chip pointer in chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: cherryview: Use GPIO chip pointer in chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask()
- From: Mika Westerberg
- [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: cherryview: Use GPIO chip pointer in chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable
- Next by Date: [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: cherryview: Use GPIO chip pointer in chv_gpio_irq_mask_unmask()
- Next by thread: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable
- Index(es):
 |