Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: stm32: Unshadow np variable in stm32_pctl_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 09:39:57AM +0200, Fabien DESSENNE wrote:
> Hi Andy
> 
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> Will this patch be applied in Linus pinctrl tree, or in the gpio-intel tree
> before being merged (linux-next) in the pinctrl tree?

I believe the pin control tree is a primary here, while applying to GPIO tree
won't harm. But I maintain neither of them :-)

> On 07/05/2022 12:22, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The np variable is used globally for stm32_pctl_probe() and in one of
> > its code branches. cppcheck is not happy with that:
> > 
> >    pinctrl-stm32.c:1530:23: warning: Local variable 'np' shadows outer variable [shadowVariable]
> > 
> > Instead of simply renaming one of the variables convert some code to
> > use a device pointer directly.
> > 
> > Fixes: bb949ed9b16b ("pinctrl: stm32: Switch to use for_each_gpiochip_node() helper")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux