On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 8:25 AM Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > pwmchip_add() unconditionally assigns the base ID dynamically. Commit > f9a8ee8c8bcd1 ("pwm: Always allocate PWM chip base ID dynamically") > dropped all base assignment from drivers under drivers/pwm/. It missed > this driver. Fix that. > > Fixes: f9a8ee8c8bcd1 ("pwm: Always allocate PWM chip base ID dynamically") > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c > index 4c1f9e1091b7..a2c8dd329b31 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c > @@ -871,13 +871,6 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, > mvpwm->chip.dev = dev; > mvpwm->chip.ops = &mvebu_pwm_ops; > mvpwm->chip.npwm = mvchip->chip.ngpio; > - /* > - * There may already be some PWM allocated, so we can't force > - * mvpwm->chip.base to a fixed point like mvchip->chip.base. > - * So, we let pwmchip_add() do the numbering and take the next free > - * region. > - */ > - mvpwm->chip.base = -1; > > spin_lock_init(&mvpwm->lock); > > -- > 2.35.1 > Queued for fixes, thanks! Bart