On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 11:41 AM Wells Lu <wellslutw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The first valid item of pin-function table should > start from the third item. The first two items, > due to historical and compatible reasons, should > be dummy items. > > The two dummy items were removed accidentally in > initial submission. This fix adds them back. > > Signed-off-by: Wells Lu <wellslutw@xxxxxxxxx> Patch applied for fixes! Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Fix an error in pin-function table of SP7021
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Fix an error in pin-function table of SP7021
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:29:30 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1650015688-19774-1-git-send-email-wellslutw@gmail.com>
- References: <1650015688-19774-1-git-send-email-wellslutw@gmail.com>
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/14] Refactor Ralink Pinctrl and Add Documentation
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/stm32: Do not call stm32_gpio_get() for edge triggered IRQs in EOI
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: Fix an error in pin-function table of SP7021
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data
- Index(es):
 |