On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 7:34 AM Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4/17/22 07:24, firew4lker wrote: ... > Linus Walleij, > > As this is backported to 5.15.y, 5.16.y, 5.17.y and those all had point > releases a bunch of people are hitting it now. If you choose to adopt > this patch instead of revert the broken one, you can add to the commit > message too: > > Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1976 I prefer to explicitly tell that this is a link to a bug report, hence BugLink:. But this is just my 2 cents. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:42:37 +0300
- In-reply-to: <67df4178-5943-69d8-0d61-f533671a1248@amd.com>
- References: <20220414025705.598-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com> <20966c6b-9045-9f8b-ba35-bf44091ce380@gmail.com> <67df4178-5943-69d8-0d61-f533671a1248@amd.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
- From: Mario Limonciello
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
- From: firew4lker
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
- From: Mario Limonciello
- [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert ocelot-pinctrl to YAML format
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
- Index(es):
 |