On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 04:01:32PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > We need to take mask into account in the set/get_multiple() callbacks. > Use bitmap_replace() instead of bitmap_copy(). Good catch! Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Fixes: cb8c474e79be ("gpio: sim: new testing module") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c > index 8e5d87984a48..41c31b10ae84 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c > @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int gpio_sim_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, > struct gpio_sim_chip *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc); > > mutex_lock(&chip->lock); > - bitmap_copy(bits, chip->value_map, gc->ngpio); > + bitmap_replace(bits, bits, chip->value_map, mask, gc->ngpio); > mutex_unlock(&chip->lock); > > return 0; > @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static void gpio_sim_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, > struct gpio_sim_chip *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc); > > mutex_lock(&chip->lock); > - bitmap_copy(chip->value_map, bits, gc->ngpio); > + bitmap_replace(chip->value_map, chip->value_map, bits, mask, gc->ngpio); > mutex_unlock(&chip->lock); > } > > -- > 2.32.0 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko