On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 4:49 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 3:38 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:55 AM Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > Description: it says nothing about enabling extra printk()s. But -DDEBUG > > > does just that; it turns on every dev_dbg()/pr_debug() that would > > > otherwise be silent. > > > > Which is what some and I are using a lot during development. > > > > AFAIK this: https://www.kernel.org/doc/local/pr_debug.txt is the right > way to do it? Yes. But it means we need to have a separate option on a per driver (or group of drivers) basis. I don't think it's a good idea right now. > https://www.kernel.org/doc/local/pr_debug.txt > > This doesn't mention adding Kconfig options just to enable debug messages. > > > ... > > > > > -ccflags-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO) += -DDEBUG > > > - > > > > NAK to this change. > > > > I'm not against enabling might_sleep() unconditionally. > > > > These are already controlled by CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, no? Or > maybe I can't parse that double negation. The part of the patch that converts might_sleep_if():s is fine with me. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko