Re: [GIT PULL] pin control fixes for the v5.17 series

[Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/28/22 15:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/28/22 06:43, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 9:38 PM Linus Torvalds
>> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 5:11 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> some more pin control fixes that trickled in the last week or
>>>> two.
>>>
>>> Hmm. Am I confused because I thought I'd see a fix for the orangepi
>>> problem that Guenter has been reporting?
>>>
>>> That problem has been pending for quite a while now.
>>
>> OK let's poke Hans, he usually fix things quickly so it must have been missed.
>>
>> Hans did you see Guenthers remark here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220128172003.GA2666058@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>> Do you want to attempt patching it or shall I just revert the patch for now?
>>
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
> 
> The fix has long since been submitted and is available in linux-next.
> 
> From my notes:
> 
> Fix posted at
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/0f536cd8-01db-5d16-2cec-ec6d19409a49@xxxxxxxxx/
> and in linux-next as commit 3c5412cdec9f ("pinctrl-sunxi:
> sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset").
> The fix exposes a lockdep splat for which a fix is posted at
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220216040037.22730-1-samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> This patch is available in linux-next as commit 4649b97042c3 ("pinctrl:
> sunxi: Use unique lockdep classes for IRQs").

Thank you, Guenter, I was just working on a similar reply.

That's my understanding as well.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> Guenter