On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 6:09 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Linux pin control maintainers, > > Single revert due to possibility of clashing with real hardware (in the nearest > future) that uses ID for different pin layout. That's why for this cycle to avoid > any potential issues or even damages of a brand new hardware. > > Thanks, > > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko Pulled in for fixes! Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.17-5
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.17-5
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 02:04:25 +0100
- In-reply-to: <YgvdxSwYkHfSuV8a@black.fi.intel.com>
- References: <YgvdxSwYkHfSuV8a@black.fi.intel.com>
- References:
- [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.17-5
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.17-5
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/10] irqchip: Prevent drivers abusing irq_chip::name
- Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] pinctrl: samsung: pull for v5.18
- Previous by thread: [GIT PULL] intel-pinctrl for 5.17-5
- Next by thread: [GIT PULL] pinctrl: samsung: pull for v5.18
- Index(es):
 |