Re: [PATCH 00/10] irqchip: Prevent drivers abusing irq_chip::name

[Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 23:41:25 +0000,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:26 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Having done that, we can cleanup a few irqchip drivers and make their
> > irq_chip structure const (which requires touching a handful of core
> > functions). Whilst we're at it, we do the same for a couple of gpio
> > drivers.
> 
> The series:
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

> Since Bartosz is queueing GPIO patches and I am mostly
> playing with a baby during the daytime it's good if you also
> get an ACK from Bartosz on this one before applying the
> series.

To be on the safe side and until I hear from Bartosz, I have dropped
the GPIO patches from the branch which I'm about to push into -next.
If Bartosz is happy with them, I'll add them to the mix. Otherwise,
they can be taken at a later time, as there is no shortage of drivers
that will need reworking once we agree on the way to resolve the
irqchip fiddling in gpiolib.

Have fun playing! :)

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.