On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 01:50:31PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > After commit 266423e60ea1 ("pinctrl: bcm2835: Change init order for gpio > hogs") a few error paths would not unwind properly the registration of > gpio ranges. Correct that by assigning a single error label and goto it > whenever we encounter a fatal error. > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) While this seems legit per se, my eyes caught this: > if (!girq->parents) { > - pinctrl_remove_gpio_range(pc->pctl_dev, &pc->gpio_range); > - return -ENOMEM; > + err = -ENOMEM; > + goto out_remove; Non-devm.... > } > > if (is_7211) { > pc->wake_irq = devm_kcalloc(dev, BCM2835_NUM_IRQS, > sizeof(*pc->wake_irq), > GFP_KERNEL); ...followed by devm. It means more ordering bugs in the ->remove() and error path are lurking around. Can you double check and be sure that we do not have a case where non-devm registration code followed by devm? If that is the case it has to be fixed as well. > - if (!pc->wake_irq) > - return -ENOMEM; > + if (!pc->wake_irq) { > + err = -ENOMEM; > + goto out_remove; > + } > } -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko