On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:04:38PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:43:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > It'd certainly be good to name anything that doesn't correspond to one > > > of the existing semantics for the API (!) something different rather > > > than adding yet another potentially overloaded meaning. > > > > It seems we're (at least) three who agree about this. Here is a patch > > fixing the name. > > And similar number of people are on the other side. If someone already opposed to the renaming (and not only the name) I must have missed that. So you think it's a good idea to keep the name platform_get_irq_optional() despite the "not found" value returned by it isn't usable as if it were a normal irq number? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
