Hi, On 1/11/22 21:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 05:42:38PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Commit bdfbef2d29dc ("pinctrl: cherryview: Don't use selection 0 to mark >> an interrupt line as unused") made the code properly differentiate >> between unset vs (hwirq) 0 entries in the GPIO-controller interrupt-line >> to GPIO pinnumber/hwirq mapping. >> >> This is causing some boards to not boot. This commit restores the old >> behavior of triggering hwirq 0 when receiving an interrupt on an >> interrupt-line for which there is no mapping. > > I conducted a research and, on the board Jarkko has issues with, all > mentioned pins are floating. > > [ 3.556875] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: interrupt on unmapped interrupt line 0 > (I believe this matches to 76 below) > > [ 37.287821] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:03: using interrupt line 0 for pin 81 > [ 37.371456] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:02: using interrupt line 0 for pin 22 > [ 37.389548] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:03: using interrupt line 2 for pin 77 > [ 37.407050] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: using interrupt line 0 for pin 76 > > Two of them are designated for SD card and Audio Daughter board. > But in all cases is seems like PCB error, unfortunately. Ok, thank you for looking into this. Regards, Hans