On Thu, 06 Jan 2022, Rob Herring wrote: > 'interrupt-parent' is never required as it can be in a parent node or a > parent node itself can be an interrupt provider. Where exactly it lives is > outside the scope of a binding schema. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml | 1 - > .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/ti,omap-mailbox.yaml | 9 --------- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cirrus,madera.yaml | 1 - Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > .../devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,etop-xway.yaml | 1 - > .../devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,xrx200-net.yaml | 1 - > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/sifive,fu740-pcie.yaml | 1 - > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-versal-cpm.yaml | 1 - > 7 files changed, 15 deletions(-) -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop required 'interrupt-parent'
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop required 'interrupt-parent'
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 10:33:23 +0000
- In-reply-to: <20220107031905.2406176-1-robh@kernel.org>
- References: <20220107031905.2406176-1-robh@kernel.org>
- References:
- [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop required 'interrupt-parent'
- From: Rob Herring
- [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop required 'interrupt-parent'
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: add pinctrl driver on mt8186
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC v5 net-next 01/13] mfd: ocelot: add support for external mfd control over SPI for the VSC7512
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop required 'interrupt-parent'
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop required 'interrupt-parent'
- Index(es):
 |