Hi, On 1/8/22 01:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 8, 2022, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Some boards set the direct_irq_en flag in the conf0 register without > setting any of the trigger bits. The direct_irq_en flag just means that > the GPIO will send IRQs directly to the APIC instead of going through > the shared interrupt for the GPIO controller, in order for the pin to > be able to actually generate IRQs the trigger flags must still be set. > > So having the direct_irq_en flag set without any trigger flags is > non-sense, log a FW_BUG warning when encountering this and clear the flag > so that a driver can actually use the pin as IRQ through gpiod_to_irq(). > > Specifically this allows the edt-ft5x06 touchscreen driver to use > INT33FC:02 pin 3 as touchscreen IRQ on the Nextbook Ares 8 tablet, > accompanied by the following new log message: > > byt_gpio INT33FC:02: [Firmware Bug]: pin 3: direct_irq_en set without trigger, clearing > > The new byt_direct_irq_sanity_check() function also checks that the > pin is actually appointed to one of the 16 direct-IRQs which the GPIO > controller supports and on success prints debug messages like these: > > byt_gpio INT33FC:02: Pin 0: uses direct IRQ 0 (APIC 67) > byt_gpio INT33FC:02: Pin 15: uses direct IRQ 2 (APIC 69) > > > Should be these updated? Yes the " (APIC 6x)" part is gone now. I will fix this for v4. > This is useful to figure out the GPIO pin belonging to ACPI > resources like this one: "Interrupt () { 0x00000043 }" or > the other way around. > > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:andy@xxxxxxxxxx>> > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>> > --- > Changes in v3: > - Rework code to check if the pin is assigned one of the 16 direct IRQs > (new code suggested-by Andy) > - Drop dev_dbg of the (likely?) APIC IRQ, only log the direct IRQ index > > > Thinking about direct IRQ mappings I will look into the Datasheet next week. Ok, I will wait for you to get back to me then before posting a v4. > > > Changes in v2: > - Add "FW_BUG pin %i: direct_irq_en set but no IRQ assigned, clearing" warning > --- > drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c > index 4c01333e1406..508b8a1cad1f 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > #define BYT_VAL_REG 0x008 > #define BYT_DFT_REG 0x00c > #define BYT_INT_STAT_REG 0x800 > +#define BYT_DIRECT_IRQ_REG 0x980 > #define BYT_DEBOUNCE_REG 0x9d0 > > /* BYT_CONF0_REG register bits */ > @@ -1465,6 +1466,27 @@ static void byt_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) > chip->irq_eoi(data); > } > > +static bool byt_direct_irq_sanity_check(struct intel_pinctrl *vg, int pin, u32 value) > +{ > + u8 *match, direct_irq[16]; > > > Oops, I thought it’ 16 u32 you need to read and in u8 it’s 64, which one is correct? There are 4 32 bit registers, the original code before your suggested refactoring did 4 readl()s . And each register holds 4 pin-numbers, for a total of maximum 16 direct IRQs. This is in the public datasheets, except that the public datasheet does not explain the meaning the byte (7 bits really, the 8th bit is reserved / always 0). The datasheet simply calls the 7 bits per direct IRQ "Direct0" / "Direct1", etc. That these 7 bits are actually the pin number of the pin triggering the direct IRQ is something which I figured out by looking at a number of cases where both the APIC IRQ number as well as the used pin were known, allowing me to figure out the mapping. Regards, Hans > > > + > + if (!(value & (BYT_TRIG_POS | BYT_TRIG_NEG))) { > + dev_warn(vg->dev, > + FW_BUG "pin %i: direct_irq_en set without trigger, clearing\n", pin); > + return false; > + } > + > + memcpy_fromio(direct_irq, vg->communities->pad_regs + BYT_DIRECT_IRQ_REG, > + sizeof(direct_irq)); > + match = memchr(direct_irq, pin, sizeof(direct_irq)); > + if (match) > + dev_dbg(vg->dev, "Pin %i: uses direct IRQ %ld\n", pin, match - direct_irq); > + else > + dev_warn(vg->dev, FW_BUG "pin %i: direct_irq_en set but no IRQ assigned, clearing\n", pin); > + > + return match; > +} > + > static void byt_init_irq_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *chip, > unsigned long *valid_mask, > unsigned int ngpios) > @@ -1492,8 +1514,13 @@ static void byt_init_irq_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *chip, > > value = readl(reg); > if (value & BYT_DIRECT_IRQ_EN) { > - clear_bit(i, valid_mask); > - dev_dbg(vg->dev, "excluding GPIO %d from IRQ domain\n", i); > + if (byt_direct_irq_sanity_check(vg, i, value)) { > + clear_bit(i, valid_mask); > + } else { > + value &= ~(BYT_DIRECT_IRQ_EN | BYT_TRIG_POS | > + BYT_TRIG_NEG | BYT_TRIG_LVL); > + writel(value, reg); > + } > } else if ((value & BYT_PIN_MUX) == byt_get_gpio_mux(vg, i)) { > byt_gpio_clear_triggering(vg, i); > dev_dbg(vg->dev, "disabling GPIO %d\n", i); > -- > 2.33.1 > > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >