Hi Alexandre, Thank you for the review. On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 3:03 PM Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 24/12/2021 14:57:48+0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote: > > platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static > > allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue > > when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property > > in the node as this bypasses the hierarchical setup and messes up the > > irq chaining. > > > > In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core > > code use platform_get_irq_optional(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c | 14 ++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c > > index fafd1f55cba7..ebfb106be97d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c > > @@ -1045,7 +1045,6 @@ static int atmel_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > const char **group_names; > > const struct of_device_id *match; > > int i, ret; > > - struct resource *res; > > struct atmel_pioctrl *atmel_pioctrl; > > const struct atmel_pioctrl_data *atmel_pioctrl_data; > > > > @@ -1164,16 +1163,15 @@ static int atmel_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > /* There is one controller but each bank has its own irq line. */ > > for (i = 0; i < atmel_pioctrl->nbanks; i++) { > > - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i); > > - if (!res) { > > + ret = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, i); > > I don't think the irq should be optional here. > The only difference between platform_get_irq() and platform_get_irq_optional() is that platform_get_irq() prints an error message in case of error. Since we are already printing an sane error message "missing irq resource for group %c\n" in the driver I've chosen platform_get_irq_optional() instead platform_get_irq(). Let me know if you want me to drop platform_get_irq_optional() and use platform_get_irq() instead, in that case I'll also drop the error message "missing irq resource for group %c\n" from the driver. Cheers, Prabhakar > > + if (ret < 0) { > > dev_err(dev, "missing irq resource for group %c\n", > > 'A' + i); > > - return -EINVAL; > > + return ret; > > } > > - atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = res->start; > > - irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(res->start, > > - atmel_gpio_irq_handler, atmel_pioctrl); > > - dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: irq=%pr\n", i, res); > > + atmel_pioctrl->irqs[i] = ret; > > + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(ret, atmel_gpio_irq_handler, atmel_pioctrl); > > + dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: irq=%d\n", i, ret); > > } > > > > atmel_pioctrl->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node, > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com