On 17-12-21, 08:12, Kent Gibson wrote: > I'm of the opinion that a rust implementation would be better targetting > the ioctls directly rather than libgpiod, as my Go library does and for > essentially the same reasons. I remember asking Linus initially about this and I was suggested to use libgpiod instead :) > To test that theory, and as an exercise to learn rust, I've been writing > one, and so far I've been calling it gpiod :-|. > > Since this crate targets libgpiod it would make sense for it to > remain named libgpiod. I agree. -- viresh