On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 03:05:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:46:11PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:37 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:14:05AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:33 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers, > > > > > > > > > > Approximately a dozen of changes for v5.17 against Intel GPIO drivers and > > > > > GPIO ACPI library. It has ben a while in Linux Next without any error reported. > > > > > > > Pulled, thanks! > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Are you going to pull series with the OF node assignments clean up? > > > I forgot to mention here that my PR does not include them. > > > > > > > Yes, I'll queue it this week. > > Thanks! > > Do you know that your branches were kicked off from the Linux Next? > Are you going to drop previous gpio-sim from the Linux Next? Last seen GPIO for-next $ git tag --contains 9dbd1ab2050 next-20211207 next-20211208 next-20211210 Last seen your old GPIO simulator $ git tag --contains 5065e08e4ef3c DONT-USE-next-20211105 next-20211101 next-20211102 next-20211103 next-20211104 next-20211105 next-20211106 next-20211108 next-20211109 next-20211110 next-20211111 next-20211112 next-20211115 next-20211116 next-20211117 next-20211118 next-20211123 next-20211124 next-20211125 next-20211126 next-20211129 next-20211130 next-20211201 next-20211202 next-20211203 next-20211206 next-20211207 next-20211208 next-20211210 next-20211213 next-20211214 next-20211215 -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko