On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 6:25 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [Me] > > Please funnel this patch through the SoC tree. > > This one was definitively going to go via ARM SoC in the absence of any > explicit routing, did you mean that patch #1 should also be routed via > ARM SoC? No just over-clarifying. I will merge patch #1 after some review slack. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: gpio-ranges property is now required
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: gpio-ranges property is now required
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 16:29:14 +0100
- In-reply-to: <04acf5f1-7d82-b12b-f70f-1712a4a2610c@gmail.com>
- References: <20211206092237.4105895-1-phil@raspberrypi.com> <20211206092237.4105895-3-phil@raspberrypi.com> <CACRpkdYJAZcr_PPCGPYcitfcwd9GDFf+7hPJkOmjomqCrruNfw@mail.gmail.com> <04acf5f1-7d82-b12b-f70f-1712a4a2610c@gmail.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: bcm2835: Fix gpio hogs and pin reinitialisation
- From: Phil Elwell
- [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: gpio-ranges property is now required
- From: Phil Elwell
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: gpio-ranges property is now required
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: gpio-ranges property is now required
- From: Florian Fainelli
- [PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: bcm2835: Fix gpio hogs and pin reinitialisation
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Move chip specific functions to right files
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add SDX65 pinctrl bindings
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: gpio-ranges property is now required
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: gpio-ranges property is now required
- Index(es):
 |