Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Move chip specific functions to right files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/1/2021 8:37 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
Thanks for clarification Srini!!

On 01/12/2021 14:33, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:


+enum lpass_lpi_functions {
+    LPI_MUX_dmic1_clk,
+    LPI_MUX_dmic1_data,
+    LPI_MUX_dmic2_clk,
+    LPI_MUX_dmic2_data,
+    LPI_MUX_dmic3_clk,
+    LPI_MUX_dmic3_data,
+    LPI_MUX_i2s1_clk,
+    LPI_MUX_i2s1_data,
+    LPI_MUX_i2s1_ws,
+    LPI_MUX_i2s2_clk,
+    LPI_MUX_i2s2_data,
+    LPI_MUX_i2s2_ws,
+    LPI_MUX_qua_mi2s_data,
+    LPI_MUX_qua_mi2s_sclk,
+    LPI_MUX_qua_mi2s_ws,
+    LPI_MUX_swr_rx_clk,
+    LPI_MUX_swr_rx_data,
+    LPI_MUX_swr_tx_clk,
+    LPI_MUX_swr_tx_data,
+    LPI_MUX_wsa_swr_clk,
+    LPI_MUX_wsa_swr_data,
+    LPI_MUX_gpio,
+    LPI_MUX__,
+};
+
+static const unsigned int gpio0_pins[] = { 0 };
+static const unsigned int gpio1_pins[] = { 1 };
+static const unsigned int gpio2_pins[] = { 2 };
+static const unsigned int gpio3_pins[] = { 3 };
+static const unsigned int gpio4_pins[] = { 4 };
+static const unsigned int gpio5_pins[] = { 5 };
+static const unsigned int gpio6_pins[] = { 6 };
+static const unsigned int gpio7_pins[] = { 7 };
+static const unsigned int gpio8_pins[] = { 8 };
+static const unsigned int gpio9_pins[] = { 9 };
+static const unsigned int gpio10_pins[] = { 10 };
+static const unsigned int gpio11_pins[] = { 11 };
+static const unsigned int gpio12_pins[] = { 12 };
+static const unsigned int gpio13_pins[] = { 13 };
>>>
to here are specific to sm8250, so it should not be in header file to start with.

As these are common to all lpass variants.. I feel it's better to keep in Header file.

You realize that every include of this file will add these static variables to file, in this case to pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c, pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.c and pinctrl-sc7280-lpass-lpi.c so in first file(pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c) you never use those variables in second file (pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.c)you only use up to gpio13 and in third file pinctrl-sc7280-lpass-lpi.c you could use them.

so its really bad idea to add static variables in header files.

Okay. Understood. will move it SoC specific files.
--srini


And if new pins comes in later variants, we can add them incrementally, and they will not impact existing pin numbers.

I think in upcoming variants number of pins will not decrease.

--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux