Thanks Linus! >-----Original Message----- >From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 6:04 AM >To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx> >Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Saha, Tamal ><tamal.saha@xxxxxxxxx>; N, Pandith <pandith.n@xxxxxxxxx>; Demakkanavar, >Kenchappa <kenchappa.demakkanavar@xxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: Add Intel Thunder Bay pinctrl driver > >Hi Lakshmi, > >thanks for your patch! Interesting chip! This is looking very good. > >I bet Andy will also give you some attention to details unless you had some >already internally at Intel. > >On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:52 PM <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >This caught my eye: > >> +#define THB_BOARD_SPECIFIC_GPIO_REQUIREMENTS_HANDLE (1u) > >We don't do this kind of conditionals, either it is there or not. >Drop this define since it is always 1 > >> +#if (THB_BOARD_SPECIFIC_GPIO_REQUIREMENTS_HANDLE) >> + >> +static u32 thb_gpio_board_requirements_handle(struct gpio_chip *chip) >> +{ >> + u32 offset, reg; >> + >> + /* 0x43 = register Offset for gpio_power_int_setup/4u */ >> + offset = 0x43; >> + reg = thb_gpio_read_reg(chip, offset); >> + >> + /* Keeping all power interrupts to Level-High triggered as suggested by >HW team */ >> + reg |= 0x1E; >> + >> + return thb_gpio_write_reg(chip, offset, reg); } > >This looks like something that can just be inlined into probe(), some HW set- >up? Yes it's hw setup. This will be removed in next version of the patchset. These changes are accommodated in the BIOS, so not required in kernel code. > >> + struct gpio_chip *chip = &tpc->chip; >(..) >> + chip->get = thunderbay_gpio_get_value; >> + chip->set = thunderbay_gpio_set_value; > >It should be trivial to also implement > >.set_config = gpiochip_generic_config > >just like the other Intel drivers. This is great because it will make things like the >generic bit-banged GPIO I2C bus use the open drain hardware support from >the chip. (Etc) Will be added in the next version of patchset. > >> + /* Register pin mapping between GPIO and PinControl */ >> + ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(chip, dev_name(tpc->dev), 0, 0, chip- >>ngpio); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(tpc->dev, "Failed to add gpiochip pin range\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } > >It's usually better to put these ranges into the device tree. The gpiolib core will >handle it. See gpio-ranges in >Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt Thanks, This will be taken care in next version. > >> +#if (THB_BOARD_SPECIFIC_GPIO_REQUIREMENTS_HANDLE) >> + /* function to handle THB board specific requirements */ >> + ret = thb_gpio_board_requirements_handle(chip); >> +#endif > >Just inline that function's code in here. Will be removed. > >Yours, >Linus Walleij Regards, Sowjanya