On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 3:47 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:28:50PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > Several drivers read the 'ngpios' device property on their own, but > > since it's defined as a standard GPIO property in the device tree bindings > > anyway, it's a good candidate for generalization. If the driver didn't > > set its gc->ngpio, try to read the 'ngpios' property from the GPIO > > device's firmware node before bailing out. > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v1 -> v2: > > - use device_property_read_u32() instead of fwnode_property_read_u32() > > - reverse the error check logic > > > > v2 -> v3: > > - don't shadow errors other than -ENODATA in device_property_read_u32() > > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > index ede8b8a7aa18..f79fd2551cf7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > @@ -599,6 +599,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data, > > int base = gc->base; > > unsigned int i; > > int ret = 0; > > + u32 ngpios; > > > > /* > > * First: allocate and populate the internal stat container, and > > @@ -647,9 +648,17 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data, > > } > > > if (gc->ngpio == 0) { > > - chip_err(gc, "tried to insert a GPIO chip with zero lines\n"); > > - ret = -EINVAL; > > - goto err_free_descs; > > + ret = device_property_read_u32(&gdev->dev, "ngpios", &ngpios); > > + if (ret) { > > + if (ret == -ENODATA) { > > + chip_err(gc, "tried to insert a GPIO chip with zero lines\n"); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + goto err_free_descs; > > + } > > And if the property returns 0 in ngpios? > > What about the modified suggestion from previous version: > > if (gc->ngpio == 0) { > ret = device_property_read_u32(&gdev->dev, "ngpios", &ngpios); The comment is a good idea but other than that - it's overcomplicating things. > if (ret == -ENODATA) > ngpios = 0; > else if (ret) > return ret; You still need to goto err_free_descs here. > > gc->ngpio = ngpios; > } > > if (gc->ngpio == 0) { Why check that again? We already know the driver set it to 0, we checked it a couple lines before. If we can't get the setting from the properties then it won't be non 0 here right? > chip_err(gc, "tried to insert a GPIO chip with zero lines\n"); > ret = -EINVAL; > goto err_free_descs; > } > > ? > > > + gc->ngpio = ngpios; > > } > > > > if (gc->ngpio > FASTPATH_NGPIO) > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > > I suggest the following: diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index ede8b8a7aa18..08c1e8fc0dfa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -599,6 +599,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data, int base = gc->base; unsigned int i; int ret = 0; + u32 ngpios; /* * First: allocate and populate the internal stat container, and @@ -647,9 +648,23 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data, } if (gc->ngpio == 0) { - chip_err(gc, "tried to insert a GPIO chip with zero lines\n"); - ret = -EINVAL; - goto err_free_descs; + /* + * If the driver didn't specify the number of GPIOs, try to + * get this value from the device properties as a fall-back. + */ + ret = device_property_read_u32(&gdev->dev, "ngpios", &ngpios); + if (ret) { + /* + * -ENODATA means that there is no property found and + * we want to issue the error message to the user. + * Besides that, we want to return different error code + * to state that supplied value is not valid. + * */ + if (ret == -ENODATA) { + chip_err(gc, "tried to insert a GPIO chip with zero lines\n"); + ret = -EINVAL; + } + + goto err_free_descs; + } + + gc->ngpio = ngpios; } if (gc->ngpio > FASTPATH_NGPIO)