Re: [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 00/23] add support for VSC75XX control over SPI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 3:14 AM Colin Foster
<colin.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:58:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: combine get resource and ioremap into single call
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: update pinctrl to automatic base address
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: convert pinctrl to regmap
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: expose ocelot_pinctrl_core_probe interface
> > >   pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: update to support regmap
> > >   device property: add helper function fwnode_get_child_node_count
> > >   pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: change device tree matches to use nodes
> > >     instead of device
> > >   pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: expose microchip_sgpio_core_probe interface
> >
> > Can these patches be broken out to its own series and handled
> > separately from the DSA stuff or is there build-time dependencies?
>
> These should all be able to be a separate series if I did my job right.
> Everything should have no functional change except for this:
>
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: update pinctrl to automatic base address
>
> Fortunately this was tested by Clément and didn't seem to have any
> ill-fated side effects.
>
> I assume this isn't something I wouldn't want to submit to net-next...
> is there a different place (tree? board? list?) where those should be
> submitted?

To the pinctrl maintainer i.e. me + linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
then I can just apply them if there are no more review comments.

Yours,
Linus Walleij




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux