On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:56:48AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Offset/pin 0 is a perfectly valid offset, so stop using it to have > the special meaning of interrupt line not used in the intr_lines. > > Instead introduce a new special INTR_LINE_UNUSED value which is never > a valid offset and use that to indicate unused interrupt lines. > > Cc: Yauhen Kharuzhy <jekhor@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: cherryview: Don't use pin/offset 0 to mark an interrupt line as unused
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: cherryview: Don't use pin/offset 0 to mark an interrupt line as unused
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:14:15 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20211118105650.207638-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20211118105650.207638-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 3/3] pinctrl: cherryview: Ignore INT33FF UID 5 ACPI device
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] pinctrl: cherryview: Do not allow the same interrupt line to be used by 2 pins
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pinctrl: cherryview: Ignore INT33FF UID 5 ACPI device
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: cherryview: Don't use pin/offset 0 to mark an interrupt line as unused
- Index(es):
 |