Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: addac: add AD74413R driver

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 16:17:24 +0200
Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Too much context removed. I had to go back and look earlier in the thread
> > to work out what was being discussed.  Particularly as I think these  
> aren't
> > even in order!  
> 
> I'm sorry, I'm new to the LKML.
> 
> > > > Rule it out in the dt binding and enforce it at probe time not here  
> which
> > > is far too late.  
> > > > As below, this should be prevented at probe time not runtime.  
> > >
> > > This is done so that the GPIO indices are kept the same as the hardware
> > > channels, 0, 1, 2, 3.
> > > Depending on their mode, some GPIOs can only be read and some of them  
> can
> > > only be written to.
> > > I'm not sure how you would want to do this at probe time?  
> >
> > I'm not totally following, but took more a look at the datasheet.
> >
> > Device has 4 GPO pins whch is fine.  Those are simple output only pins.  
> For
> > those, if they are in a mode where you are controlling them then you can
> > cache the value - if they are in comparator mode then they aren't really
> > acting as GPIO pins at all the value you are reading is reflecting the
> > input on the other side of the device on a different pin. So in that
> > case don't register these with the GPIO subsystem at all.
> > Instead you are registering channels selected from A,B,C,D
> >  
> > >
> > > Logic parallel mode is reserved for set_multiple, when the GPIO is in  
> logic
> > > mode.  
> > So, it took me a while to understand what we would loose by 'only'  
> providing
> > the logic parallel mode.  If we only had logic high / logic low as the  
> options
> > then a sensible driver option would be to map any GPO configuration to the
> > logic parallel mode.  It enables more functionality.  However, that got  
> me thinking
> > for why we had high impedance and 100kOhms as options.
> >
> > These allow you to implement shared buses over these pins.  Which  
> incidentally
> > should probably be mapped through to the various gpio subsystem controls
> > to reflect these options.
> >
> > So the state combinations you might well have would be...
> >
> > Logic low / logic high
> > 100kOhm pull down / logic high (something like an i2c bus would use this)
> > tristate so logic low / logic high / high impedance.(don't care or off)
> >
> > Other than the first one, these require you to not be in the GPO mode.
> >
> > However, this is all stuff that depends on what these are wired to - so  
> the
> > dts should reflect that rather than simply setting the mode to one of
> >
> > +          0 - GPO_CONFIG_100K_PULL_DOWN
> > +          1 - GPO_CONFIG_LOGIC
> > +          3 - GPO_CONFIG_DEBOUNCED_COMPARATOR
> > +          4 - GPO_CONFIG_HIGH_IMPEDANCE
> >
> > The only exception being the debounce comparator. So the question is where
> > would that be wired to?
> >  
> > > GPIOs are referred to as GPO in the datasheet, so I used this name in  
> the
> > > driver too.  
> >
> > Sort of... As above, the output pins are GPO, the input pins are the ones
> > the comparator is running on - whilst there value is relected on the  
> outputs
> > when in the right mode (and that's the only one you can read them in) they
> > are not the same channel.  I'm not sure they should map to the same  
> index...
> >  
> > >  
> > > > Error out of this function is fine, but why not just leave this  
> channel
> > > disabled
> > > rather than failing to probe which I think is what will currently  
> happen?
> > >
> > > Sure, I could make invalid channel and gpo functions fallback to default
> > > function.
> > > But why tolerate errors in the dts configuration?  
> >
> > I don't think it is an error but rather a function you haven't enabled yet
> > in a specific driver.  dts is for the hardware, not your particular  
> driver.
> >
> > Mind you, I think the binding around this needs to change entirely anyway
> > so this will probably not end up relevant.  
> 
> Okay, so after some more thought I realized where I went wrong with
> this implementation. I'm writing down my ideas before I go implement
> it so we can get on the same page.
> 
> Device-tree configuration should only specify if a gpo is in comparator
> mode or not. When not in comparator mode, the gpo is in output mode.
> When in output mode, it is exposed as an output-only gpio pin.
> 
> When a channel is in digital input mode, an input-only gpio is exposed
> for the value of the comparator result, which can be read via the
> DIN_COMP_OUT register.

Yes, though I think you also need to somehow reflect that it's an entirely
different input rather than being the same pin as the output gpios
would be on if in that mode.  I'm not sure how you would do that in the
gpio subsystem, possibly the offset?

> 
> Regarding high impedance and pull down resistor, should I be implementing
> these features by implementing gpio_chip->set_config function and
> handling the PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE,
> PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN flags?

Yes, I think so.

> 
> The comparator also has a setting for debounce time, so I could also handle
> PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_DEBOUNCE.

Sound right to me, but gpio people may disagree :)

Jonathan

> 
> Thank you for your patience.
> Cosmin.