On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:18 PM Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Drop ROHM BD70528 support I am always for the code removal, but the Q here is do you think there won't be similar chips that may utilize the code and avoid duplication in the future? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 15:06:05 +0200
- In-reply-to: <cover.1635412162.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
- References: <cover.1635412162.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support
- From: Vaittinen, Matti
- Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support
- References:
- [RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support
- From: Matti Vaittinen
- [RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: ralink: include 'ralink_regs.h' in 'pinctrl-mt7620.c'
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: ralink: include 'ralink_regs.h' in 'pinctrl-mt7620.c'
- Previous by thread: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] MAINTAINERS: bd70528: Drop ROHM BD70528 drivers
- Next by thread: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support
- Index(es):
 |