RE: [PATCH v5 0/2] gpio: mlxbf2: Introduce proper interrupt handling

[Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Bart,

I was just wondering what is the status for this series of patches?

Thank you.
Asmaa

-----Original Message-----
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 2:01 PM
To: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>; open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM <linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; David S . Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rafael J . Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; David Thompson <davthompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] gpio: mlxbf2: Introduce proper interrupt handling
Importance: High

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 6:48 PM Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is a follow up on a discussion regarding proper handling of GPIO 
> interrupts within the gpio-mlxbf2.c driver.
>
> Link to discussion:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210816115953.72533-7-andriy.shevchenk
> o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
>
> Patch 1 adds support to a GPIO IRQ handler in gpio-mlxbf2.c.
> Patch 2 is a follow up removal of custom GPIO IRQ handling from the 
> mlxbf_gige driver and replacing it with a simple IRQ request. The ACPI 
> table for the mlxbf_gige driver is responsible for instantiating the 
> PHY GPIO interrupt via GpioInt.
>
> Andy Shevchenko, could you please review this patch series.
> David Miller, could you please ack the changes in the mlxbf_gige 
> driver.
>
> v5 vs. v4 patch:
> - Remove a fix which check if bgpio_init has failed.
>   This fix should in a separate patch targeting the stable
>   branch.
>

Hi Asmaa! Did you send this fix? I can't find it in my inbox or on patchwork.

Bart