Hi Prabhakar, On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 3:45 PM Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add support to get/set drive-strength and output-impedance-ohms > for the supported pins. > > While at it also renamed the below macros to match the HW manual, > PIN_CFG_IOLH_SD0 -> PIN_CFG_IO_VMC_SD0 > PIN_CFG_IOLH_SD1 -> PIN_CFG_IO_VMC_SD1 > PIN_CFG_IOLH_QSPI -> PIN_CFG_IO_VMC_QSPI > PIN_CFG_IOLH_ETH0 -> PIN_CFG_IO_VMC_ETH0 > PIN_CFG_IOLH_ETH1 -> PIN_CFG_IO_VMC_ETH1 > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for the update! > --- > RFC->v1 > * Renamed macros to match HW manual You may want to split that off into a separate patch, as not all lines changed are touched for other reasons. BTW, where do I find these "VMC" names in the HW manual? > * Added PIN_CFG_IOLH_A/B macros to differentiate Group A/B > * Added helper function to read/rmw pin config > * Included RB tags > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > +static u32 rzg2l_read_pin_config(void __iomem *addr, > + u8 bit, u32 mask) The above fits on a single line. > +{ > + void __iomem *addr_adjust = addr; > + u8 bit_adjust = bit; No need for these, just operate on addr and bit directly. > + u32 reg; > + > + if (bit >= 4) { > + bit_adjust -= 4; > + addr_adjust += 4; > + } > + > + reg = readl(addr_adjust) & (mask << (bit_adjust * 8)); > + return (reg >> (bit_adjust * 8)); > +} > + > +static void rzg2l_rmw_pin_config(void __iomem *addr, > + u8 bit, u32 mask, u32 val) > +{ The above fits on a single line. > + void __iomem *addr_adjust = addr; > + u8 bit_adjust = bit; No need for these, just operate on addr and bit directly. > + u32 reg; > + > + if (bit >= 4) { > + bit_adjust -= 4; > + addr_adjust += 4; > + } > + > + reg = readl(addr_adjust) & ~(mask << (bit_adjust * 8)); > + > + writel(reg | val, addr_adjust); I think you should handle "val << (bit * 8)" here, instead of in all callers. > +} Please split the introduction of these helpers (and add conversion of the existing PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE handling) off into a separate patch. > @@ -484,6 +544,34 @@ static int rzg2l_pinctrl_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > break; > } > > + case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH: { > + static const unsigned int mA[4] = { 2, 4, 8, 12 }; > + > + if (!(cfg & PIN_CFG_IOLH_A)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); > + addr = pctrl->base + IOLH(port); > + reg = rzg2l_read_pin_config(addr, bit, IOLH_MASK); > + arg = mA[reg]; > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); Do you need the spinlock for reading? > + break; > + } > + > + case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT_IMPEDANCE_OHMS: { > + static const unsigned int oi[4] = { 100, 66, 50, 33 }; > + > + if (!(cfg & PIN_CFG_IOLH_B)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); > + addr = pctrl->base + IOLH(port); > + reg = rzg2l_read_pin_config(addr, bit, IOLH_MASK); > + arg = oi[reg]; > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); Likewise. > + break; > + } > + > default: > return -ENOTSUPP; > } > @@ -564,6 +659,49 @@ static int rzg2l_pinctrl_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); > break; > } > + > + case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH: { > + unsigned int arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(_configs[i]); > + static const unsigned int mA[4] = { 2, 4, 8, 12 }; Duplicate, move to file scope? > + > + if (!(cfg & PIN_CFG_IOLH_A)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mA); i++) { > + if (arg == mA[i]) > + break; > + } > + if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(mA)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); > + addr = pctrl->base + IOLH(port); > + rzg2l_rmw_pin_config(addr, bit, IOLH_MASK, (i << (bit * 8))); Pass pctrl and offset instead of addr (also for rzg2l_read_pin_config, for symmetry), and move locking into rzg2l_rmw_pin_config()? Taking all of the above into account, that would become: rzg2l_rmw_pin_config(pctrl, IOLH(port), bit, IOLH_MASK, i); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); > + break; > + } > + > + case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT_IMPEDANCE_OHMS: { > + unsigned int arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(_configs[i]); > + static const unsigned int oi[4] = { 100, 66, 50, 33 }; Duplicate, move to file scope? > + > + if (!(cfg & PIN_CFG_IOLH_B)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(oi); i++) { > + if (arg == oi[i]) > + break; > + } > + if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(oi)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); > + addr = pctrl->base + IOLH(port); > + rzg2l_rmw_pin_config(addr, bit, IOLH_MASK, (i << (bit * 8))); Likewise. > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); > + break; > + } > + > default: > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > } The rest looks good to me! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds