Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] reset: starfive-jh7100: Add StarFive JH7100 reset driver

[Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 15:39, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 4:35 PM Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 14:56, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 8:43 PM Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > Why all these ugly % 32 against constants?
> >
> > Because the JH7100_RST_ values goes higher than 31. There is a
> > BIT_MASK macro, but that does % BITS_PER_LONG and this is a 64bit
> > machine.
>
> And? It's exactly what you have to use!


> > > Can you convert this to simple
> > >
> > >   if (assert)
> > >     ret = readl_...
> > >   else
> > >     ret = readl_...
> > >
> > > below?
> >
> > I don't see how that would work. We're using the done value in in the
> > readl_poll_timeout. Maybe you can be a bit more explicit.
>
> Supply done either == mask or == ^mask. Try it.

So you want this?
if (assert)
  ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(reg_status, value, (value & mask) ==
done, 0, 1000);
else
  ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(reg_status, value, (value & mask) ==
^done, 0, 1000);

The compiler might be clever enough, but I'd worry the long body of
the readl_poll_timeout_atomic macro is inline twice. Rather than just
flipping the bit in `done`.