Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] gpio-amdpt: ACPI: Use the ACPI_COMPANION() macro directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The ACPI_HANDLE() macro is a wrapper arond the ACPI_COMPANION()
> macro and the ACPI handle produced by the former comes from the
> ACPI device object produced by the latter, so it is way more
> straightforward to evaluate the latter directly instead of passing
> the handle produced by the former to acpi_bus_get_device().
>
> Modify pt_gpio_probe() accordingly (no intentional functional impact).
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c |    4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c
> @@ -72,12 +72,10 @@ static void pt_gpio_free(struct gpio_chi
>  static int pt_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -       struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
> -       acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
>         struct pt_gpio_chip *pt_gpio;
>         int ret = 0;
>
> -       if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev)) {
> +       if (!ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
>                 dev_err(dev, "PT GPIO device node not found\n");
>                 return -ENODEV;
>         }
>
>
>

Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux