On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The ACPI_HANDLE() macro is a wrapper arond the ACPI_COMPANION() > macro and the ACPI handle produced by the former comes from the > ACPI device object produced by the latter, so it is way more > straightforward to evaluate the latter directly instead of passing > the handle produced by the former to acpi_bus_get_device(). > > Modify pt_gpio_probe() accordingly (no intentional functional impact). > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpio-amdpt.c > @@ -72,12 +72,10 @@ static void pt_gpio_free(struct gpio_chi > static int pt_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > - struct acpi_device *acpi_dev; > - acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev); > struct pt_gpio_chip *pt_gpio; > int ret = 0; > > - if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev)) { > + if (!ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) { > dev_err(dev, "PT GPIO device node not found\n"); > return -ENODEV; > } > > > Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>