Re: [PATCH V2 linux-pinctrl 1/2] Revert "dt-bindings: pinctrl: bcm4708-pinmux: rework binding to use syscon"

[Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 10:08:46PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 08.10.2021 21:48, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:39:38 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > > From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > This reverts commit 2ae80900f239484069569380e1fc4340fd6e0089.
> > > 
> > > My rework was unneeded & wrong. It replaced a clear & correct "reg"
> > > property usage with a custom "offset" one.
> > > 
> > > Back then I didn't understand how to properly handle CRU block binding.
> > > I heard / read about syscon and tried to use it in a totally invalid
> > > way. That change also missed Rob's review (obviously).
> > > 
> > > Northstar's pin controller is a simple consistent hardware block that
> > > can be cleanly mapped using a 0x24 long reg space.
> > > 
> > > Since the rework commit there wasn't any follow up modifying in-kernel
> > > DTS files to use the new binding. Broadcom also isn't known to use that
> > > bugged binding. There is close to zero chance this revert may actually
> > > cause problems / regressions.
> > > 
> > > This commit is a simple revert. Example binding may (should) be updated
> > > / cleaned up but that can be handled separately.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > V2: Update brcm,cru.yaml to avoid new yamllint warnings/errors
> > > ---
> > >   .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,cru.yaml     | 11 +++++----
> > >   .../bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.yaml      | 23 +++++++++++--------
> > >   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> > 
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > 
> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.example.dt.yaml: cru@1800c100: $nodename:0: 'cru@1800c100' does not match '^([a-z][a-z0-9\\-]+-bus|bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$'
> > 	From schema: /usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/dtschema/schemas/simple-bus.yaml
> 
> It's warning we already have and not something introduced by this
> revert.

We don't allow warnings, so you're saying this one was warning before?

> As a revert this commit should introduce as little non-revert changes
> as possible. I'm planning to improve that example later in a separated
> commit.

You have to fix the warning as part of this series.

> 
> Can you take a look at this commit despite your bot warning, please?

If 'CRU' is a hardware block, then I don't think most of the revert is 
right to use 'simple-bus'. 

If you want to just replace 'offset' with 'reg', then I'd be happy to 
see that. I've been pushing child nodes of syscons in that direction.

Rob