Re: [PATCH regression fix] gpiolib: acpi: Make set-debounce-timeout failures non fatal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:56 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:17 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
> <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:42 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 9/21/21 8:28 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:39 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > >> Fixes: 8dcb7a15a585 ("gpiolib: acpi: Take into account debounce settings")
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Bartosz will pick this up I think, I'm a bit off duty with GPIO right now.
> > >
> > > Added Bartosz to the To: list, to make sure that he actually
> > > sees this. I somehow did not add him in the To/Cc when sending out
> > > the patch, sorry about that.
> >
> > Yep, I only process patches that are directed to me personally (TO or CC).
>
> Hmm... It's then strange that GPIO lib ACPI is not listed for you in
> MAINTAINERS.
> Perhaps we need to update MAINTAINERS as well.
>

With the following line in MAINTAINERS:

    7998 F:      drivers/gpio/

My name should pop up for all patches aimed at the GPIO subsystem if
one uses scripts/get_maintainer.pl.

Bart



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux