Re: [GIT PULL] gpio: updates for v5.15

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:36 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:36 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >  We also have a new/old GPIO driver for rockchip - this
> > one has been split out of the pinctrl driver, hence the pull from the
> > pinctrl tree you can see in my branch. Another merge in the tree is from Andy
> > for the intel drivers.
>
> I appreciate the heads-up, but just *look* at those merges.
>
> The intel GPIO merge at least talks about what it does, and looks
> sane. I'm not convinced that automated shortlogs are great, but
> whatever. The merge isn't bad.
>
> The rockchip one?
>
> All I can say is "WTF?"
>
> This is the complete and full commit message:
>
>     Merge branch 'ib-rockchip' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl
> into gpio/for-next
>
> what part of that screams "that's an acceptable commit message" to you?
>
> If the reason for that merge was that you want to have the current
> state so that you can split it up, then SAY SO, for chrissake!
>
> Not that useless commit message.
>
> Why do I have to tell this to people SEVERAL TIMES EVERY SINGLE MERGE WINDOW?
>
> Merge commits need explanations. They need explanations for why the
> merge is done, and what the merge pulls in. Not this "single line that
> doesn't explain anything".
>
> Dammit.
>
> I've pulled this, but I'm upset. I'm upset because I've told people
> literally hundreds of times by now. Merge commits are not some trivial
> thing that should be ignored. Quite the reverse. Merge commits are
> generally worth *more* explanation than normal commits, and should
> take *more* effort and thought than some random code commit that is
> obvious from just the code.
>
> Exactly because merges are *not* obvious from just looking at the
> code. It's not some one-liner that is self-explanatory.
>
> If you cannot be bothered to make proper merge messages, then don't do
> the merge. If y ou don't have a good reason for the merge that you can
> articulate, then don't do the merge. If you can't explain what you are
> merging, then don't do the merge.
>
> It really is that simple.
>
> I've pulled this, but I'm really fed up.
>
>             Linus

Hi Linus,

Thanks and sorry, noted for the future PRs.

Bartosz