> Any reason you are not cc’ing me? ;) Yes, your reviews are too strict ;) No, seriously, since you always responded to the patchset anyhow, I didn't see a need.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
- From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:38:47 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAHp75VdNnvUfMEL3gMrJOFix3AATL8LAiU18LXJJVL77feBRow@mail.gmail.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20210901194549.3999-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20210901194549.3999-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <CAHp75VdNnvUfMEL3gMrJOFix3AATL8LAiU18LXJJVL77feBRow@mail.gmail.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
- References:
- [PATCH 0/1] gpio: add simple logic analyzer using polling
- From: Wolfram Sang
- [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
- From: Wolfram Sang
- [PATCH 0/1] gpio: add simple logic analyzer using polling
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: tegra: add multiple interrupt support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling
- Index(es):
 |