Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Convert GPIO to use software nodes

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 5:19 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 02:33:28PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 4:11 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The driver can provide a software node group instead of
> > > > > > passing legacy platform data. This will allow to drop
> > > > > > the legacy platform data structures along with unifying
> > > > > > a child device driver to use same interface for all
> > > > > > property providers, i.e. Device Tree, ACPI, and board files.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Doesn't seem to want to apply.
> > > >
> > > > Would it be okay for you to pull the immutable tag?
> > >
> > > What immutable tag?
> >
> > It's here:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andy/linux-gpio-intel.git/tag/?h=intel-gpio-v5.15-1
>
> My Ack can't be merged like that.

Which one? There are two on different patches.
Do you have any documentation on the rules you imply by MFD?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko