Re: [PATCH 6/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: add missing rk3568 cru phandles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peter,

Am Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2021, 15:55:31 CEST schrieb Peter Geis:
> The grf and pmugrf phandles are necessary for the pmucru and cru to
> modify clocks. Add these phandles to permit adjusting the clock rates
> and muxes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
> index 0905fac0726a..8ba0516eedd8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
> @@ -218,6 +218,8 @@ grf: syscon@fdc60000 {
>  	pmucru: clock-controller@fdd00000 {
>  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pmucru";
>  		reg = <0x0 0xfdd00000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +		rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
> +		rockchip,pmugrf = <&pmugrf>;

I don't think the pmucru needs both and in fact the mainline
clock driver should just reference its specific grf at all, i.e.
	pmucru -> pmugrf (via the rockchip,grf handle)
	cru -> grf

I've not seen anything breaking this scope so far.


Heiko

>  		#clock-cells = <1>;
>  		#reset-cells = <1>;
>  	};
> @@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ pmucru: clock-controller@fdd00000 {
>  	cru: clock-controller@fdd20000 {
>  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-cru";
>  		reg = <0x0 0xfdd20000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +		rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
>  		#clock-cells = <1>;
>  		#reset-cells = <1>;
>  	};
> 







[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux